Technology Update: Way to New Energy (E67)

49 Comments

  1. Joey Jitzel said:

    Terra Power is one such company that is researching TWR technology (Traveling Wave Reactor) and is partially owned by Bill Gates. They have received $40 million from the US govt for research and plans are moving forward to build a prototype reactor in China.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  2. Harish Ravi said:

    No proof of fusion in easy reach yet yes heating a plasma and making it run a steam turbine a good story. I think it takes 15 billion K as that's the repulsive energy matching the thermal energy for it to just touch and stop when the nuclear forces really act to fuse. Not achieved on earth yet. But maybe at the tail of the Boltzmann maybe it might fuse a bit at 100 million K. Directed fusion with accelerated collision based fusion might have been done . Fusion hunt cost 100 amusent parks so far who said this wasn't fun ☺️.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  3. Jonathan Mackie said:

    maybe in thirty-one years Thay might have one as small as a tire just maybe

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  4. Robin Gilliver said:

    Thorium!

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  5. Kb123 B123 said:

    Fusion electricity? In the end, they have produced nothing

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  6. Kb123 B123 said:

    What a load of you know what

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  7. goodcat1982 said:

    all these different countries and private companies rushing to build the same thing and not sharing any of their findings or technology all because of competition and patents. It's no wonder it takes humans so long to do things. Profit first, people last.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  8. Uta Kata said:

    Fusion** doe not happen in nature. Not fission

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  9. Mark Shulaw said:

    Please talk down to us. Bye!

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  10. MR. MooseTache said:

    I say stop this what happens if. What happens if god only knows happens what if it explodes you have nothing to do , a star has just exploded on the earth

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  11. paymex209 x said:

    who is pulling the strings in trying to be god leave that shit alone

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  12. Gregory Hamlet said:

    J

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  13. Andy Appan said:

    NO CARBON POWER PLANT RUN BY CATAPULT WATER RENEWABLE ENERGY 1.23 Mn lbs/sft THRUST JET COST, OPM- 50 %

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  14. boxlessthinking said:

    didn't they hear over a hundred years ago they said its impossible to make perpetual motion.. military weapons program in diskies.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  15. TGamer Bailey said:

    so nuclear fusion is more safer ok

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  16. Gangster Camel said:

    just wow

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  17. Genri said:

    Americans copy Russians

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  18. Timothy Brooks said:

    Remember when RT was unbiased, this is dogshit reporting.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  19. Fick Dich said:

    So how much of the documentary is cut off? felt like there is like 10 minutes missing

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  20. tjzx3432 said:

    First, heat is a result not a necessity for fusion. This is because the gravity supplies the great pressure, the electromagnetic movement supplies the pattern, and the electrostatic field supplies the repulsion force allowing the sun to sustain a longer reaction. The methods we are trying right now are literally trying to reverse engineer the sun, smh it's not that complicated if you understand how space acts.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  21. Mcbreezy said:

    tf is a lory

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  22. Quadratgamer said:

    A natural nuclear reactor existed in Gabon, Africa 2 bilion years ago.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  23. lnpilot said:

    22:30 – wow. Machine shop, with no one wearing eye protection.
    Pretty scary.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  24. CMDR Simansky said:

    where is other half

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  25. Petros Kefallinos said:

    My thoughts are that the sun doesn't use energy to heat up all this hydrogen because of his enormous mass, thats why it produces so much.
    We here on earth have to use energy to heat it up so we can achieve fusion. So we have a massive problem.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  26. Robert Weekes said:

    Since only a tiny fraction of the plasma particles will hit the inner wall, fusion is inherently inefficient for producing electricity. Advanced fission is far superior – see Kirk Sorensen's #thorium videos

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  27. Grzegorz Durda said:

    Its like these guys are trying to prove basic laws of physics wrong. Nothing is free. You cant get more out then you put in.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  28. admiral net said:

    لدي نضريه جديده لعمل الاندماج النووي بطريقه سهله وغير مكلفه لاكن لم اجد جهات يهمهم الامر لاني في بلد لا يهتم لهاذهي الاشياء

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  29. Michael O'Leary said:

    u no all talk about the sun core are lies nothing man made can get to the core lol it all melted temp max is unknown fact.
    there just testing lightning in bottle trick lol

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  30. Herman Brümmer said:

    RT is such a fucking cut lying shit face organization. Won't ever support them

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  31. SHIVRAJ PATIL said:

    it is renewable or not

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  32. Mike Becker said:

    A lot of thumb's up; They don't know what it is' means' or will do them' but hea!!!! They love it' har har har' har har har!!!! lie's lie's lie's lie's lie's lie's lie's' surprise' surprise' surprise?!!!

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  33. Best Bi said:

    I know some of these words!

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  34. Eiad Alkhayat said:

    i feel they are talking how great is Russia not about fusion

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  35. quinto190 said:

    I suspect it will not work, because the underlying theory is wrong. The sun might not be a nuclear furnace. There is fusion, but in the sun's corona and not in the core.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  36. tejas birje said:

    UPGRED WIND MILL WITH THE HELP OF TEJAM URJA TECH,CONTACT =CSIR INDIA.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  37. followthefleet1 said:

    The sun better NOT be setting on nuclear power. The waste "problem" has been solved with GenIV nuclear fission. Fusion is many decades away. ITER is massive, complicated, and extremely expensive. Gen IV is here now. In the next 5 to 15 years the first plants will be commercialized. This video is deeply misinformed. The new plants like the GEH S-PRISM reactor burn nuclear "waste", and actually use it as FUEL. Of the several types of GenIV, all cannot meltdown; work at low pressure; do not use water coolant; and even if struck by a missile would splash but solidify before hitting the ground. With these characteristics they should be significantly cheaper than conventional nuclear power, and hopefully coal and gas..

    Climate science puts the date for the "tipping points" somewhere between 2050 and 2070, and around 450 ppm carbon dioxide; and the approximately "2C fence". Beyond this timeline and earth faces irreversible climate effects. This is why the new reactors for several companies are all being designed for mass production, and standardization, with the goal being the electrification of the grid, and then the electrification of the whole economy. This is why we need full scale prototypes by 2030, as we would have 20 years to make the grid clean…like France.

    Helping, is the unlimited supply of uranium oxide from the oceans. There are 100 trillion tons of it in underwater mountain ranges, and at any moment, 4 billion tons available for extraction. And extraction is exactly what technology has already achieved. We should have commercial extraction of uranium commonplace very soon. Uranium is soon to be a renewable resource.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  38. Mahir Fredericks said:

    3 words… molten salt reactor… we need a stepping stone… something that will provide enough power to start a fusion reactor

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  39. Jess Stuart said:

    1:42 Nuclear Fission occurs all the time in nature! It's just not concentrated.
    8:19 "its purpose is to show all the major technological and physical problems have been solved." What a load of B.S.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  40. Thomas Dobyns said:

    This is nothing more than false and intentionally misleading information. LFTR IS the cleanest, cheapest, safest energy available. We don't have to fight wars to get and keep it. If we don't build LFTR generators in spite of the current political control, the USA is history. And ..we have the technology already.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  41. Al said:

    fuck you

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  42. 唐阿酷 said:

    the size doesn't matter, it's the EMFs pressure that really matters.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  43. theboxmodder said:

    This seems to be an advertisement for Russia. We get it. You made one a long time ago. But with the nature of Science and Journals, I'd imagine a lot of people around the world helped tremendously in the efforts to complete projecrs like these. So get off of it.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  44. Samir Sarkar said:

    Yes.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  45. Ankur Bishnoi said:

    this shit is old…. USA masters in fusion energy…. China is just developing… China is by far 5 yrs behind USA and ero

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  46. kain Zed said:

    PLEASE TELL ME WHATS THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE GERMANY'S

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  47. Paul Cross said:

    How is this new? Might be a new way to turn the crank, but that's all it is, a new way to turn the turbine to produce electricity. New should be a new way to harness the power? We have been useing steam and explosions to turn the turbines since the beginning of the steam age.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  48. martin smith said:

    All these Scientist are Plasma specialists, which if they want to keep their job must sell the idea of Plasma Fusion!

    May 25, 2019
    Reply
  49. martin smith said:

    This documentary is crap, these systems only create energy for split seconds. In the 1960's it was Britain's Zeta that would produce abundent energy in just a few years, same old story better to invest in enhanced conductors like Graphene & Thermoelectrics.

    May 25, 2019
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *